<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Printer and Scanner, or All-In-One? Readers Weigh In</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ofzenandcomputing.com/zanswers/1156/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ofzenandcomputing.com/zanswers/1156</link>
	<description>Clear Answers to Common Computing Questions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:37:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Limitedmage</title>
		<link>http://www.ofzenandcomputing.com/zanswers/1156/comment-page-1#comment-7595</link>
		<dc:creator>Limitedmage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 23:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ofzenandcomputing.com/?p=1156#comment-7595</guid>
		<description>I have a cheap-o HP Deskjet All-in-one. Scans really nicely at max. 1200 dpi. Prints OK, but not as good as my old HP Deskjet printer did before it broke. But I&#039;ve had it for almost 2 years now and it works great, no problems at all. And best of all, I&#039;ve saved lots of space on my desk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a cheap-o HP Deskjet All-in-one. Scans really nicely at max. 1200 dpi. Prints OK, but not as good as my old HP Deskjet printer did before it broke. But I&#8217;ve had it for almost 2 years now and it works great, no problems at all. And best of all, I&#8217;ve saved lots of space on my desk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Of Zen and Computing</title>
		<link>http://www.ofzenandcomputing.com/zanswers/1156/comment-page-1#comment-7593</link>
		<dc:creator>Of Zen and Computing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 17:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ofzenandcomputing.com/?p=1156#comment-7593</guid>
		<description>I agree with John on the more unfortunate points of owning an inkjet. If you don&#039;t use it frequently you may have issues with the ink congealing or drying, or the cartridges themselves having a built-in expiration &quot;feature&quot; by the manufacturer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with John on the more unfortunate points of owning an inkjet. If you don&#8217;t use it frequently you may have issues with the ink congealing or drying, or the cartridges themselves having a built-in expiration &#8220;feature&#8221; by the manufacturer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnMc</title>
		<link>http://www.ofzenandcomputing.com/zanswers/1156/comment-page-1#comment-7592</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnMc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ofzenandcomputing.com/?p=1156#comment-7592</guid>
		<description>I used to be the printer god at a fortune 10. If you are going to look at an all in one, then prepare to pay &gt;$250 for it. Anything less than that is crud and guaranteed to break in less than 18mos. 

At my home office I have the following setup --

1/ $120 mono laser on the network. 
2/ Xerox duplex Scanner [$400] Yeah alot of money but I scan a TON of docs and need the reliability. A Visioneer at $140 would also work. 
3/ Drop.io [website] for sending a receiving faxes. I don&#039;t do a lot of faxing these days so that occasional need is handled by this free service. Highly recommended. 

Yes I spent more than those $200 wonders but the equipment is 3 years old and still working as good as the day it was purchased. Any single function dies I replace that unit only. 

If you really, really need a all-in-one then go with a laser based product. The inkjet models will eat you alive in cartridge costs. I was partial to the old Lexmark X400. But alas it has been discontinued. My pick today? HP Laserjet 1522 MFP. Its laser, has all the function and is &lt;$400. You will still have it 4 years from now. The annual use cost is better than those cheapie inkjet models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to be the printer god at a fortune 10. If you are going to look at an all in one, then prepare to pay &gt;$250 for it. Anything less than that is crud and guaranteed to break in less than 18mos. </p>
<p>At my home office I have the following setup &#8211;</p>
<p>1/ $120 mono laser on the network.<br />
2/ Xerox duplex Scanner [$400] Yeah alot of money but I scan a TON of docs and need the reliability. A Visioneer at $140 would also work.<br />
3/ Drop.io [website] for sending a receiving faxes. I don&#8217;t do a lot of faxing these days so that occasional need is handled by this free service. Highly recommended. </p>
<p>Yes I spent more than those $200 wonders but the equipment is 3 years old and still working as good as the day it was purchased. Any single function dies I replace that unit only. </p>
<p>If you really, really need a all-in-one then go with a laser based product. The inkjet models will eat you alive in cartridge costs. I was partial to the old Lexmark X400. But alas it has been discontinued. My pick today? HP Laserjet 1522 MFP. Its laser, has all the function and is &lt;$400. You will still have it 4 years from now. The annual use cost is better than those cheapie inkjet models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: df5</title>
		<link>http://www.ofzenandcomputing.com/zanswers/1156/comment-page-1#comment-7591</link>
		<dc:creator>df5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ofzenandcomputing.com/?p=1156#comment-7591</guid>
		<description>Repair is a non option.

2 devices, each that does their, and only their, job well. You might pay a little more up front, but the quality should be better and on first device failure you will recoup your up front costs.

Smaller utilities doing a defined job very well. It&#039;s the UNIX way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Repair is a non option.</p>
<p>2 devices, each that does their, and only their, job well. You might pay a little more up front, but the quality should be better and on first device failure you will recoup your up front costs.</p>
<p>Smaller utilities doing a defined job very well. It&#8217;s the UNIX way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
