<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Keep Digital Photos Safe: A Guide to Backing Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ofzenandcomputing.com/zanswers/957/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ofzenandcomputing.com/zanswers/957</link>
	<description>Clear Answers to Common Computing Questions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:37:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Of Zen and Computing</title>
		<link>http://www.ofzenandcomputing.com/zanswers/957/comment-page-1#comment-3916</link>
		<dc:creator>Of Zen and Computing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ofzenandcomputing.com/zanswers/957#comment-3916</guid>
		<description>I have much more first-hand experience with Flickr, so I limited myself to their service. SmugMug has been around for a while, so I am sure it would also make an excellent choice for online photo storage if you say so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have much more first-hand experience with Flickr, so I limited myself to their service. SmugMug has been around for a while, so I am sure it would also make an excellent choice for online photo storage if you say so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.ofzenandcomputing.com/zanswers/957/comment-page-1#comment-3914</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ofzenandcomputing.com/zanswers/957#comment-3914</guid>
		<description>I prefer to use smugmug.  To my knowledge, Flickr used to resize your pictures, whereas Smugmug.com retains the full quality photo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer to use smugmug.  To my knowledge, Flickr used to resize your pictures, whereas Smugmug.com retains the full quality photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
